Pristine Grace
Page 1 of 2 1 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Is it time for Hyper-Calvinists to accept the term "Hyper-Calvinist"

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    England
    Posts
    30
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    19
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    18
    Thanked in
    11 Posts

    Is it time for Hyper-Calvinists to accept the term "Hyper-Calvinist"

    Hyper-Calvinists have long hated the term Hyper-Calvinist. "Hyper" sounds bad, like a hyperactive child or something. Clearly "Hyper-Calvinist" is meant pejoratively by those who use it. But the words don't seem to imply anything inherently wrong. "Hyper" just means 'above' or 'beyond' and I'm quite happy to say that I go above and beyond Calvin, and the large swath of Calvinists throughout history, in various areas. I am a 'Hyper-Calvinist' in that sense.

    I appreciate that some people don't want to identify themselves according to the doctrines they hold, and consistently reject the term, "Calvinist" as well as "Hyper-Calvinist." But even then, when one is speaking about doctrine, like on an internet discussion forum, it can be quite helpful to identify one's doctrines by referring to oneself as a "pre-millennialist" or a "credo-baptist" or a "Calvinist" as opposed to an "Arminian." Therefore, when it comes to certain questions, such as "Do people have a duty to be born again?" it seems to make sense for those (such as myself) who answer "no" to call ourselves Hyper-Calvinists. That way, we distinguish ourselves from the majority of professing Calvinists today, who would answer the opposite way.

    Gays, back in the 60s, chose to "redeem" or "own" the word "gay," which was originally meant as an insult. Christians today almost universally choose to own the word "Christian" even though that too was meant originally as an insult.

    Is it time for Hyper-Calvinists to do the same? What would be the advantages and disadvantages of doing so? Would owning the term help us break out of our marginalized status, and make the doctrines we believe in more acceptable?

    One final observation: they're going to call us Hyper-Calvinists regardless. So why not own the term?

    My view, as you will have guessed, is that we should own the term, at least when talking about doctrine, although I'm happy to have my mind changed.

    Love that the forum is back. Thank you Brandon.
    Last edited by alt731; 01-14-19 at 01:05 PM.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to alt731 For This Useful Post:

    Brandan (01-14-19), Forester07 (01-15-19), Krablessed1973 (01-14-19)

  3. #2
    Administrator Brandan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    5,833
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    148
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    94
    Thanked in
    62 Posts
    Hi John,

    Welcome back to the forum! Glad to have you back, and I'm glad to have this forum operational again. I ended up having to go back and grab an old backup I made and started again with a previous version of the software. It's not the best, but it's good enough for now.

    You have a good point, that we might as well "own" the label. I don't care for the name "calvinist" though because there is SOOOOO much baggage in that word today. That word alone can mean just about anything you want it to believe. The same goes for they hyper variants. Honestly I'd just like to get away from it all. And even amongst honest to goodness "hyper-calvinists" there are different types... Some reject the "free offer" while still embracing duty faith, like the Protestant Reformed Church.

    Lately, I've been meeting with some believers that most would call hyper-calvinists, but you will never hear that term used amongst them. They're just simple "free grace" believers. Most would be called supralapsarian absolute predestinarians, but they're not that familiar with that kind of terminology. So anyway, that's probably how I identify myself. I'm a "hyper-calvinist" to the rest of the unbelieving world, but amongst me and my friends, we're just free grace believers. And I kind of like that.

    Thanks for your post my fellow hyper!

    Brandan

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Brandan For This Useful Post:

    Forester07 (01-15-19), Krablessed1973 (01-14-19), Pam (01-16-19)

  5. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    343
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    21
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Hi All,

    I used to post on here some years ago under, "The Hawker". I am now a convinced believer in Christ's free grace, having turned my back on main stream Christianity. I now attend and am a member of a Gospel Standard Baptist Chapel. Thus I have turned my back on the "free offer of the gospel", "duty faith" among other things. I long to know more of God and His Word. I feel there is much that I don't know in His Word, that I want to know.

    Labels like "hyper-Calvinism" are not helpful. They are terms that are used to snipe against us, but if that is what folks want to do, let them.

    The Lord be with you all!

    Warm Christian regards,
    Kevin.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Krablessed1973 For This Useful Post:

    Brandan (01-15-19)

  7. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    England
    Posts
    30
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    19
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    18
    Thanked in
    11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Krablessed1973 View Post
    Labels like "hyper-Calvinism" are not helpful. They are terms that are used to snipe against us, but if that is what folks want to do, let them.
    I'm always inclined towards the attitude which says, "Don't give over the lexicon." In other words, I hate it when people who are in the right, accept terms for themselves that make them look bad. It reflects badly, not only on them, but on the positions they hold.

    But the times when people have chosen to "own" the insults they've been called, when its worked I mean, have been times when the "insult" has been, in one sense, positive. I don't want to be a "Calvinist," constrained by the teachings of one man, however godly he was. I want to go above and beyond Calvin. Surely Christ went beyond Calvin!

    The word "gay" and "Christian" literally mean 'happy' and 'Christ follower'. I'm happy to be called a Christian. I grieve that those who practice their miserable wickedness are popularly known as "gay." But these are both terms that those people were being called anyway. We're going to be called Calvinists whether we like it or not. I'd rather amend that, for people, and say, "No. I'm a Hyper-Calvinist, a Beyond-Calvinist." And to those who would call me a Hyper-Calvinist, I'd like to say, "Absolutely I go beyond Calvin. I am a Hyper-Calvinist." I might even add, "and now that Calvin is with Christ, in heaven, he is a hyper-Calvinist too!"

    ---

    I would add one proviso. Please, if you are a young man reading this, don't get yourself into trouble with your pastor by calling yourself a Hyper-Calvinist. Many Calvinistic churches are run rather like small fiefdoms, with the Pastor in absolute control, deciding who is in, who is out, and who to discipline. None of that is Biblical, but it does exist, so if you're going to get yourself into trouble, do it over an issue that's worth getting yourself into trouble over, not this one.
    Last edited by alt731; 01-15-19 at 06:12 AM.
    I don't like being corrected, but don't worry about that, do it anyway. I'll get over it.

  8. #5
    Administrator Brandan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    5,833
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    148
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    94
    Thanked in
    62 Posts
    I guess it’s kind of like Trump’s deplorables.

  9. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    240
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    10 Posts
    Washington Kid here! I am formerly "Kentucky Kid" on P-Net in the past but in God's providence He moved me from Kentucky to Washington state.
    I attend a gospel honoring congregation in Oregon. We are a sovereign grace baptist congregation. I'm SO blessed of God to be able to attend.
    It is located in the Dalles, OR if anyone lives nearby.
    I have no problem using labels because it identifies who we are or what we believe.
    I really don't like being called a Calvinist because I am not "Reformed". I am a gospel standard baptist which are labeled Hyper-Calvinist. There are
    at least 3 gospel standard congregations in the USA. But the group of sovereign grace baptists I am connected with in my discernment are the most God
    honoring congregations that I know of.
    So on this site I have no problem being labeled a Hyper- Calvinist. It describes who I am. If you read Brandan's article on what a Hyper-Calvinist is that's
    where I am. Been one since 1983. I haven't changed any major Hyper-Calvinist doctrines since then= washed in the blood Hyper-Cal.

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Washington Kid For This Useful Post:

    alt731 (01-15-19), Bob Higby (02-06-19), Brandan (01-15-19), Forester07 (01-15-19)

  11. #7
    Administrator Brandan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    5,833
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    148
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    94
    Thanked in
    62 Posts
    Thank you Craig for posting! You're definitely a hyper friend!

  12. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    240
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    10 Posts
    Brandan as they say in Kentucky: we-in's Hypers son!

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Washington Kid For This Useful Post:

    Brandan (01-15-19)

  14. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Hawaiian Islands
    Posts
    3,673
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    75
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    120
    Thanked in
    66 Posts
    The main reason I don't like the label is because I don't want others telling me what I am. When the 'hyper-Calvinist' label is used today, it means a lot more than it meant historically (not that the history is all good), now it is applied by theologians such as Sinclair Ferguson (who represents the current Presbyterian mindset at large) to ALL supralapsarians (ditto for the label 'antinomian').

    Calvin was one reformer in the matter of Sovereign Grace, Luther and Zwingli (and many others) were before him and many other reformers of sounder doctrine came after, most of whom we can name. I don't know why we can't just call ourselves hyper-Grace!

    --Bro. Bob

  15. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bob Higby For This Useful Post:

    Brandan (01-16-19), Forester07 (01-16-19), Krablessed1973 (01-16-19)

  16. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    13
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    27
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    15
    Thanked in
    8 Posts
    I don't mind the label at all. I sometimes will identify by it in order to nip conversations in the bud.

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Razor For This Useful Post:

    Bob Higby (02-01-19), Brandan (01-30-19)

  18. #11
    Administrator Brandan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    5,833
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    148
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    94
    Thanked in
    62 Posts
    Welcome back Razor!
    This is my signature.

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brandan For This Useful Post:

    Bob Higby (02-01-19), Razor (01-30-19)

  20. #12
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Hawaiian Islands
    Posts
    3,673
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    75
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    120
    Thanked in
    66 Posts
    When I look at all of the anti-hyper Calvinist trash on the internet, I stand by my assertion that I will let no man define who I am personally by a ridiculous and stupid label that is supposed to end all argument by the mere use of it to condemn someone. The meaning of this 'label' has changed constantly throughout all of post-Calvin history, of course. I will leave all of the composers of this neo-hyper Calvinist labeling trash to their false happiness in 'lying for God.' As I have stated many times, provide me with a list of denominations who support this as their essential doctrine, just like such a list can easily be created for hundreds of 'Arminian' denominations. Bro. Bob

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Bob Higby For This Useful Post:

    Brandan (02-01-19)

  22. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    England
    Posts
    30
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    19
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    18
    Thanked in
    11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Higby View Post
    I will leave all of the composers of this neo-hyper Calvinist labeling trash to their false happiness in 'lying for God.' As I have stated many times, provide me with a list of denominations who support this as their essential doctrine, just like such a list can easily be created for hundreds of 'Arminian' denominations. Bro. Bob
    A neo-hyper Calvinist? Whaaaaaa?

    What is that, Bob?
    I don't like being corrected, but don't worry about that, do it anyway. I'll get over it.

  23. #14
    Administrator Brandan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    5,833
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    148
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    94
    Thanked in
    62 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by alt731 View Post
    A neo-hyper Calvinist? Whaaaaaa?

    What is that, Bob?
    I think Bob is referring to the fact that the definition of a hyper-calvinist has changed over time.
    This is my signature.

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Brandan For This Useful Post:

    Bob Higby (02-06-19)

  25. #15
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Hawaiian Islands
    Posts
    3,673
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    75
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    120
    Thanked in
    66 Posts
    Yes, the definitions have drastically changed. For instance, 'Common Grace' was not even an debated issue until Abraham Kuyper, now anyone who disagrees with use of the term is tagged a 'hyper-Calvinist'.

    For those teachers today who call all true supralapsarians hyper-Calvinists and antinomians, these men are definitely hypo-Calvinists pure and simple. I could provide a lot of links if anyone wishes it, however, it's all very easy to find with web searches.

    Bob

  26. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    240
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    10 Posts
    Bob I like the label "hyper-grace"!

  27. The Following User Says Thank You to Washington Kid For This Useful Post:

    Bob Higby (02-06-19)

  28. #17
    Administrator Brandan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    5,833
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    148
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    94
    Thanked in
    62 Posts
    I started using the term hyper free-gracer last year to describe what I am.

  29. The Following User Says Thank You to Brandan For This Useful Post:

    Bob Higby (02-06-19)

  30. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    240
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    10 Posts
    Brandan:

  31. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Washington Kid For This Useful Post:

    Bob Higby (02-06-19), Brandan (02-04-19)

  32. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    13
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    27
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    15
    Thanked in
    8 Posts
    I have used Effectual Redemptionist for several years now.

  33. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Razor For This Useful Post:

    Bob Higby (02-06-19), Brandan (02-04-19)

  34. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    240
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    17
    Thanked in
    10 Posts
    Razor: yea that's a good label too!

  35. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Washington Kid For This Useful Post:

    Bob Higby (02-06-19), Brandan (02-04-19), Razor (02-23-19)

Page 1 of 2 1 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •