Going Beyond Calvin

     Why going farther and beyond Calvin or traditional "Calvinism" must necessarily be wrong, evil, dangerous? From whence cometh this idea that all development in doctrine should cease after 1648 / or 1689? 

     I am a living, breathing "hyper" ("above", "beyond") Calvinist on some points and I'm quite OK with that.

Topics: Hyper-Calvinism Church Bulletin Articles
Views: 99