What makes the Christ of the Bible different from the Christ of Arminianism?
Answered in 1 source
The Christ of the Bible is sovereign and effective in saving the elect, while the Christ of Arminianism is seen as contingent upon human choice.
The stark difference between the Christ of the Bible and the Christ of Arminianism lies in their respective views on sovereignty and salvation. The Christ of Arminianism is often characterized as one who offers salvation to all individuals, hoping they will accept this offer of grace; however, this portrayal presents a Savior who is ultimately unable to fulfill His promise due to human rejection. In contrast, the Christ of the Bible ensures that every individual whom He has chosen will come to faith and ultimately be saved, as evidenced in John 6:37-40—'All that the Father gives Me will come to Me.' This distinction affirms that the true Christ operates in complete control over the salvation process, safeguarding the eternal security of the believer and reinforcing that their salvation does not hinge on personal decisions or efforts.
Scripture References:
John 6:37-40, Romans 8:29-30, Jude 24-25
Commentary