Why going farther and beyond Calvin or traditional "Calvinism" must necessarily be wrong, evil, dangerous? From whence cometh this idea that all development in doctrine should cease after 1648 / or 1689?
I am a living, breathing "hyper" ("above", "beyond") Calvinist on some points and I'm quite OK with that.
Comments
Your comment has been submitted and is awaiting moderation. Once approved, it will appear on this page.
Be the first to comment!