Bootstrap
Gilbert Beebe

Invitation of the Gospel?

Gilbert Beebe 5 min read
32 Articles 8 Books
0 Comments
Gilbert Beebe
Gilbert Beebe 5 min read
32 articles 8 books

Gilbert Beebe argues that the gospel contains no true invitations but rather authoritative calls grounded in God's sovereign will. He distinguishes between an invitation (which leaves compliance to the recipient's volition) and a divine call or command (which accomplishes its purpose through God's omnipotent power), illustrating his point with examples such as Christ's raising of Lazarus and His call to the spiritually dead. Beebe contends that speaking of gospel "invitations" reflects Arminian theology rather than Reformed doctrine and diminishes God's sovereignty, arguing instead that God's sheep hear His effectual call and necessarily follow because He has quickened them to respond.

What does the Bible say about invitations in the gospel?

The Bible does not present invitations in the gospel as mere suggestions but as commands reflecting God's sovereign will.

The concept of invitations in the gospel is often misunderstood. While some may perceive calls to action as invitations based on human volition, scripture indicates that God's words are commands rooted in His sovereign power. In John 7:37, when Jesus says, 'If any man thirst, let him come unto me,' it is not merely an invitation but a divine summons to those whom He has already quickened to a spiritual thirst. His words carry omnipotence, meaning they cannot be resisted by those whom He has chosen. Understanding this is crucial, as it emphasizes that true compliance with God's word is not contingent upon human will but is a result of His grace and power.

John 7:37, Ezekiel 34:31, John 10:3-4

How do we know the doctrine of God's sovereignty in salvation is true?

The doctrine of God's sovereignty in salvation is affirmed by numerous scripture passages that stress God's ultimate control over human decisions.

The sovereignty of God in salvation is a fundamental tenet of Reformed theology supported by biblical evidence. For instance, Ephesians 1:4-5 teaches that believers were chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world, highlighting God's preemptive grace and control over salvation. Furthermore, Romans 8:28-30 emphasizes that God works all things according to the counsel of His will, meaning that His purpose prevails in the calling of the saints. The New Testament repeatedly underscores that faith itself is a gift from God (Ephesians 2:8-9). Thus, recognizing God's sovereignty is vital for an accurate understanding of salvation, as it places divine agency at the forefront, rather than human effort.

Ephesians 1:4-5, Romans 8:28-30, Ephesians 2:8-9

Why is understanding divine calling important for Christians?

Understanding divine calling assures Christians of God's active role in their salvation and ongoing spiritual journey.

The importance of recognizing divine calling cannot be overstated for Christians. It assures them that their faith and ability to respond to God stem from His initiative rather than their own merit. Jesus illustrates this in John 10:3-4, where He calls His own sheep by name, emphasizing His personal relationship with His followers and their spiritual awakening. Additionally, acknowledging that faith is a result of divine calling rather than human capacity helps to alleviate the burden of performance or self-effort in the believer's life. This strong foundation in God's sovereignty not only provides comfort but also deepens one's understanding of grace, leading to a more robust faith.

John 10:3-4, 1 Corinthians 1:26-29, 2 Timothy 1:9

New Vernon, N. Y., July 15, 1846

    MUCH is said about them, and spirited controversy is often raised in deciding whether they are made to the world indiscriminately or only to the children of God.  Few have paused to inquire at the sacred oracle, whether there be invitations of any kind in the gospel or not.  If there are invitations in the gospel, where are they?  What are they?  And unto whom are they addressed?  These are questions which naturally enough arise, and which the reader may feel but little doubt that he is able to answer satisfactorily; but before he attempts the task let him duly consider what it is that constitutes an invitation.  Take for example any message that God has ever communicated to man, whether in the law or in the gospel, and to make of it an invitation, the compliance with the message must rest entirely on the volition of the person or persons addressed.  Nothing beyond the simple issuing of the invitation can depend on the will of him from whom it proceeds.  Is this the case in regard to any thing which God has spoken in the gospel?  Or has God in any case in the law or in the gospel sent a message concerning the result of which his will has nothing to do?  Impossible; for he "worketh all things after the counsel of his own will," and it is God that worketh in his children, both to will and to do according to his good pleasure.

    The difference between a call or command, and an invitation, may be illustrated thus:  A man may say to his neighbor, "Will you oblige me with your company," &c.  Here it is plain to see that the will of the individual alone is to determine whether the other party shall be gratified.  But if a magistrate issues his warrant or summons, and in the name of the people of the state or nation commands the immediate attendance or personal appearance of a person, the will of the summoned person is not consulted, and therefore the message is not an invitation, but a summons with authority.  Even the character of a message expressed in the same words takes the form of an invitation or a command, according to the will that governs it.  A man may say, Come unto me, all ye that thirst, and I will give you drink.  This would be an invitation, because the man supposed to give the invitation has no power to compel a compliance; all the power to determine is with the person addressed.  But when God speaks the word, it stands fast; when he commands, it is done.  His words are clothed with omnipotent power, as when he commanded, saying, "Let there be light."  He did not invite light, for no will but his own was consulted, and he said, Let it be, and it was.  Jesus our Lord did not invite Lazarus to come forth from his grave, although the same words, if spoken to a living person and left optional with such person, whether to comply or not, would have been but an invitation; but, spoken as they  were by Christ, and addressed to one who had neither power to will nor to do, could imply nothing like invitation.

    When Jesus stood and cried, "If any man thirst, let him come unto me and drink," he no more invited the thirsty, than he invited the light when he said, Let there be light.  In the first place there is not a soul on the earth that does or can thirst for the living waters which flow from him, until he quickens it, and makes it thirst, and when made to feel its thirst, and even when the tongue faileth for thirst , it can no more approach the living fountain than it can make a world, until Jesus applies, not the invitation, but the word, "Come unto me."  His words are spirit and they are life; and his sheep hear them, and they know his voice, and they follow him; because they have no power or even disposition to resist their Shepherd's voice.  The calling of the saints is no where in the scriptures denominated an invitation. he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out.  If he only invited them they would have to get out themselves, or stay behind.  But when he calls, the dead hear his voice (not his invitation,) and they that hear shall live.  How would it suit the condition of a poor, lost, helpless soul, one that feels his poverty, inability and impotence, to read the word thus: The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall be invited to live, and they who accept the invitation shall live.  And when he inviteth forth his own sheep he goeth before them, provided they accept the invitation.  It is perfectly in keeping with every feature of arminianism for workmongers to talk of invitations of the gospel, because the very term implies the willing and the doing power to be in the creature.  But it is neither in harmony with the doctrine or experience of the saints of God to so speak of his communications to them as to imply that he has yielded up the government to them; that he has hinged the effect and result of his communications on their will instead of his own will.  It is derogatory to his character, it reflects on his wisdom, power, and grace, and the term should be expunged from the vocabulary of Bible Baptists.

Comments

0 / 2000 characters
Comments are moderated before appearing.

Be the first to comment!

97
Joshua

Joshua

Shall we play a game? Ask me about articles, sermons, or theology from our library. I can also help you navigate the site.