In "What Evil Hath He Done?", Peter L. Meney addresses the profound theological themes of the innocence of Christ and the substitutionary atonement made for humanity's sins as depicted in Mark 15:6-15. Meney articulates that Jesus stands worthy as an innocent Savior, exonerated even by a Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, who, despite recognizing Jesus's lack of guilt, succumbs to political pressure. Scripture references, including the testimonies from both Pilate and various biblical authors affirming Christ's sinlessness (e.g., 2 Corinthians 5:21, 1 Peter 2:22), clarify that Jesus's innocence underscores His suitability to bear humanity's sins. This narrative serves both as a stark contrast between Barabbas, a sinner deserving death, and Christ, the innocent One offered as the atoning sacrifice, illustrating the central Reformed doctrine of justification by faith and the grace believers receive through His blood (Romans 5:9). The sermon ultimately emphasizes that, like Barabbas, all of humanity is in need of the grace extended through Christ's sacrifice, which warrants believers to echo the request for His blood upon themselves and their children as a prayer for redemption.
“What evil hath he done? … and in making that plea, he bore witness to the Bible's clear testimony that our Lord Jesus was always and ever without sin.”
“Barabbas is a picture of grace because he was released when the Lord went to the cross.”
“Let us not read these verses dispassionately. God, give us grace, give us sense to read these verses over, not with the familiarity of having read them a hundred or a thousand times.”
“If we can by faith cry that same phrase, his blood be on us and on our children, then these words are a prayer of the highest order and greatest value.”
Auto-generated transcript • May contain errors
Comments
Your comment has been submitted and is awaiting moderation. Once approved, it will appear on this page.
Be the first to comment!