In his sermon titled "The Religion of Ishmael," Todd Nibert explores the theological distinction between salvation by grace and salvation by works, represented through the biblical figures of Ishmael and Isaac. He argues that Ishmael embodies a religion based on human effort to fulfill God's promise, correlating it with the principles of the law that ultimately lead to bondage (Galatians 4:21-31). Nibert references Genesis 25:12-18, elaborating on the names of Ishmael's twelve sons, each symbolizing aspects of this works-based religion, in contrast to the grace of God exemplified by Isaac. The practical significance lies in clarifying that true salvation is solely by God's initiative and grace, rendering any dependence on human effort as futile and indicative of the law's bondage. This teaching highlights a core Reformed tenet that salvation is not a partnership between God and humanity but a divine act of grace.
“There are two views of salvation... God doing His part and me doing my part. The other view is God doing it all."
“If any part of your salvation is dependent upon you... you won't be saved. That's law. That's Mount Sinai."
“The religion of Ishmael represents works religion... if salvation is dependent upon me doing my part, what a burden there is in the religion of Ishmael.”
“Ishmael represents us doing our part... thank God for the religion of Isaac, the religion of God's promise.”
Auto-generated transcript • May contain errors
Comments
Your comment has been submitted and is awaiting moderation. Once approved, it will appear on this page.
Be the first to comment!