I’ve been building something for most of my adult life, and I didn’t know it had a name until recently. I didn’t know it could be reduced to a single sentence. I thought I just had a collection of beliefs, a set of convictions I’d arrived at through Scripture and experience and a lot of late nights with a King James Bible and a cup of coffee. But somewhere along the way, I started to notice a pattern. The same principle kept showing up in every domain. Theology. Philosophy. Marriage. Church. Baptism. Ethics. Politics. The nature of the human mind. The nature of heaven and hell. Every time I turned a corner, the same truth was standing there waiting for me.
And eventually I realized it wasn’t a collection of beliefs at all. It was one belief. Applied everywhere.
Here is the sentence:
“Everything that exists is a thought in the mind of God, sustained by His will, authored by His purpose, and held together by personal covenants of love.”
That’s it. That’s the whole system. Every chapter in this book is a derivation of that sentence. Every position I hold traces back to it. Every objection I answer is an objection to some part of it. And if you accept the sentence, everything else follows with a kind of inevitability that I didn’t plan and couldn’t have manufactured. The system builds itself. I just noticed.
And if you reject the sentence, you can close this book now and save yourself the trouble. Because nothing that comes after it will make any sense without it.
Now let me show you what it means.
Not some things. Everything. Every atom, every thought, every sin, every act of grace. Every drop of rain and every heartbeat. Every word you’ve ever spoken and every feeling you’ve ever felt. Every event in history and every moment of your private life. Everything that exists is included. There are no exceptions, no carve-outs, no categories that fall outside the scope.
This is where most people get uncomfortable, and I understand why. Because if everything that exists is a thought in the mind of God, then evil exists because God is thinking it. Sin exists because God is thinking it. The fall of Adam, the crucifixion of Christ, the suffering of innocents, the damnation of the wicked, all of it is included in the word everything. And most theologians, if they’re being honest, will try to find a way around this. They’ll talk about God “permitting” evil rather than authoring it. They’ll invoke “secondary causes.” They’ll construct elaborate systems of divine permission that allow them to maintain God’s sovereignty in theory while protecting Him from the accusation of authoring sin in practice.
I won’t do that. And the reason I won’t do that is because the Scriptures won’t let me.
“I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.” (Isaiah 45:7)
That verse says what it says. The Hebrew word is ra. It means evil, wickedness, calamity, disaster. God creates it. Not permits it. Not allows it. Creates it. And if you’re tempted to soften that word, to translate it as “calamity” only and strip out the moral dimension, you have to explain why God would need to clarify that He creates calamity but not moral evil. The whole point of the verse is that there is nothing outside His authorship. Light and darkness. Peace and evil. “I the Lord do all these things.”
The reluctance to accept this comes from a place I’ll address many times throughout this book. It comes from a Greek philosopher named Plato, who wrote in his Republic that the divine must never be proposed as the author of evil. That single philosophical assumption has infected every major system of Christian theology since the Patristic era. Augustine imported it. The Reformers inherited it. And to this day, even the most rigorous Calvinists will recite the phrase “God is not the author of sin” as if it were Scripture. It is not Scripture. It is Plato. And Plato’s chief hatred was the Hebrew Scriptures.
I’ll have much more to say about the law of Plato as we go. For now, I only want to establish this: when I say everything that exists, I mean everything. Including the parts that make us uncomfortable. Including evil. Including sin. Including the things we wish we could assign to some other source. There is no other source. There is only God.
Not a creation in the mechanical sense. Not an object manufactured by a cosmic engineer. A thought. Information. The product of a mind.
This is the heart of the entire framework, and it’s where most people’s assumptions get turned upside down. The modern world operates on the assumption that matter is fundamental and mind is emergent. That the physical universe came first, and consciousness arose from it at some point through some process we don’t fully understand. Atoms formed molecules, molecules formed cells, cells formed brains, and brains produced minds. Matter first. Mind second.
The Bible says the exact opposite.
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” (John 1:1)
In the beginning was the Word. Not in the beginning was the atom. Not in the beginning was the particle. The Word. Logos. Information. Language. Mind. Before there was a single speck of matter in the universe, there was a Word. And the Word was God. And the Word was with God. Information before matter. Mind before molecules. The invisible before the visible.
And the writer of Hebrews drives it home:
“Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.” (Hebrews 11:3)
Read that carefully. “Things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.” The visible world was not made from visible material. It was made from something invisible. Something unseen. Something that does not appear in the physical sense. The entire physical universe is derived from a non-physical source. That source is the Word. The thought. The mind of God.
And Paul again in Colossians:
“For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.” (Colossians 1:16-17)
“By him all things consist.” The word consist means to hold together, to cohere. Present tense. Continuous. Not “by him all things were set in motion” as if God wound up a clock and walked away. By him all things consist. Right now. This moment. The physical universe is being held in existence by a mind that is actively thinking it. Remove the mind, and the matter ceases to exist. Not eventually. Instantly. Because the matter was never self-sustaining. It was always a thought.
And one more, from Paul’s sermon on Mars Hill:
“For in him we live, and move, and have our being.” (Acts 17:28)
We exist in God. Not alongside God. Not in a universe that God created and then stepped back from. In him. We live in his thought. We move in his thought. We have our being in his thought. The physical world is not the container. God’s mind is the container. And everything we experience as “reality” is the rendering of that thought into a form our senses can process.
This is the philosophical position known as idealism. Mind precedes matter. The invisible is more real than the visible. And I want to be honest about something here, because I think honesty serves the reader better than pretending I arrived at this position solely through exegesis. I arrived at it through both Scripture and the work of a Greek philosopher, and the irony is not lost on me that I’m about to credit a philosopher in the same chapter where I’ve attacked one.
Plato was the first great idealist in Western philosophy. His Theory of Forms proposed that the physical world is a shadow of a higher, invisible reality. The things we see are imperfect copies of eternal, unchanging realities that exist beyond the senses. A chair is a shadow of the Form of “chair.” A beautiful sunset is a shadow of the Form of beauty. The visible world is a rendering, and the invisible world is the substance.
Plato got the architecture right. The ontology is correct. Mind precedes matter. The invisible is more real than the visible. I have no quarrel with that. Where Plato went catastrophically wrong was in two specific areas: first, in his insistence that the divine cannot author evil, which we’ve already addressed. And second, in his dualism between body and spirit, which led him and every philosopher influenced by him to treat the physical as inherently lesser, dirtier, and further from God than the spiritual. This error produced Gnosticism, the church’s embarrassment about the human body, and the assumption that heaven means escaping the physical. All of which are wrong, and all of which this book will address in due course.
So I take from Plato his ontology and reject his ethics. I use his best insight and throw out his worst errors. And I am campless even in philosophy.
Not a thought floating in the void. A thought in the mind of God. Specific. Personal. Located. The physical world is not an abstraction. It’s not the product of an impersonal force or an unconscious process. It’s the product of a Person who is thinking it on purpose.
And this is where idealism becomes theology. Because secular idealism, and there are secular idealists, can propose that reality is information without proposing a Mind behind it. The simulation hypothesis, which has gained popularity in recent years, asks whether we might be living in a computer simulation. And the honest answer from this framework is: yes. In a sense, we are. But the Simulator is not a machine. The Simulator is personal, sovereign, conscious, and the simulation is called creation. The secular version asks the right question with the wrong answer.
I’ve been writing code since I was ten years old. I know what authored information looks like. When I look at DNA, I see code. I don’t mean that metaphorically. I mean it literally. DNA is a four-letter digital code that stores, transmits, and executes information. It has syntax. It has error-correction. It has regulatory elements and nested instructions. And in forty years of programming, I have never once encountered a functional information system that was produced by random processes. Not once. Every information system I’ve ever seen was authored by a mind.
This isn’t the “intelligent design” argument, though it overlaps with it. Intelligent design still operates within a mechanistic framework. It says, “Look at the complexity. Someone must have designed it.” But the framework of this book isn’t about design. It’s about authorship. A designer builds a machine. An Author thinks a thought. The difference is that the machine can exist independently of the designer. A thought cannot exist independently of the mind that thinks it. Remove the designer, and the machine keeps running. Remove the Author, and the thought, and everything it contains, vanishes.
That’s why Colossians 1:17 uses the present tense. “By him all things consist.” The Author is still thinking. He never stopped. And if He stopped, we would cease to exist. Not die. Cease. Because we are not machines that God built and left running. We are thoughts He is actively thinking.
Not wound up and left to run. Sustained. Actively. Continuously. Every moment.
Some theological systems treat God’s relationship to creation as if He built a watch, wound it up, set it on a shelf, and occasionally intervenes when something goes wrong. They call this “providence,” and it sounds pious, but it’s actually a form of deism with a prayer life. The God of that system is a watchmaker. The God of this system is an Author who is writing in real time.
“Upholding all things by the word of his power.” (Hebrews 1:3)
Upholding. Present participle. Not “having upheld.” Not “will uphold.” Upholding. Right now. This instant. God is sustaining reality by His will at this very moment. If His will were withdrawn from a single atom, that atom would cease. If His will were withdrawn from a single soul, that soul would cease. Nothing self-sustains. Everything is held.
And this means there are no accidents. No surprises. No events that catch God off guard. Because every event is His thought. You don’t get surprised by your own thoughts. You author them.
This is absolute predestination. And I’m not going to soften it.
Every event in history was authored by God before it happened. “Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure.” (Isaiah 46:10). Every word, every action, every sin, every grace, every raindrop, every heartbeat. Authored. Not permitted. Not foreseen. Not responded to. Authored.
“Permission” is sovereignty with plausible deniability. And God doesn’t need plausible deniability. He doesn’t need to protect Himself from the charge of authoring evil, because He told us plainly that He creates it. The theological world has spent centuries building elaborate systems to distance God from the events He Himself claims to have authored, and every one of those systems breaks under the weight of Isaiah 45:7. I know that’s a hard sentence. I know it’s uncomfortable. But the Scriptures don’t give us comfortable. They give us truth.
I’ll spend an entire chapter on supralapsarianism later in this book. For now, I only want you to understand this: when the sentence says “authored by His purpose,” it means everything. The fall. The cross. Your conversion. Your doubts. Your sin. Your sanctification. All of it was authored by a God who doesn’t ask for your cooperation and doesn’t need your permission. He is the Author. We are the characters. And the story is His.
And here is where the sentence opens its arms.
Because if I stopped at “authored by His purpose,” this would be a cold, terrifying system. A God who authors everything, including evil, and does so for purposes we cannot question. That’s sovereignty without tenderness. That’s raw power without love. And that’s not the God of the Bible.
The God of the Bible makes covenants. Personal promises. Not legal contracts, not institutional frameworks, not impersonal decrees. Personal, experiential, relational promises of love. “I will be their God, and they shall be my people.” (Jeremiah 31:33). That’s not the language of a courtroom. That’s the language of a marriage. That’s the language of a Father who has chosen His children before the foundation of the world and holds them, personally, by name, forever.
A covenant is not a contract. A contract requires two independent parties negotiating terms. But in idealism, there are no two independent parties. There is only the Author and His characters. The character cannot negotiate with the mind that thinks him into existence. The character can only receive. And what God gives is not a legal arrangement but a promise. A personal, unbreakable, eternal promise of love.
This is what separates this framework from the cold, hard systems that give Calvinism its reputation. Sovereignty without love is tyranny. But sovereignty with love is the most comforting truth in the universe. Because it means the God who authored everything, including the hardest parts of your life, did so within the context of a personal promise to you. Not to a class of people. Not to a theological category. To you. Because you are a specific thought in His mind, and He holds you by a covenant that was made before you were born and will endure long after the stars burn out.
Before we move on, I want to name the thread that runs through this entire book, because once you see it, you’ll see it everywhere.
I call it operational idealism. Not idealism as an abstract philosophical position, but idealism as the operating system for daily life. The invisible is more real than the visible. And that principle applies to everything:
The covenant precedes the ceremony. The regeneration precedes the faith. The promise precedes the condition. The thought precedes the matter. The substance precedes the formality. Christ precedes the law. The Spirit precedes the water.
In every single domain of life, the invisible reality comes first, and the visible expression follows. The wedding doesn’t create the marriage. The water doesn’t create the regeneration. The church council didn’t create the canon. The law didn’t create the righteousness. In every case, the substance was already there. The ceremony just announced it.
This is not a theory. This is how the universe works. And once you see it, you can’t unsee it. Every chapter in this book is an application of this one principle to a different domain. And if the principle is true, if the invisible really does precede the visible in every case, then every system of thought that puts the visible first, that makes the ceremony the cause of the reality, that treats the physical as fundamental and the spiritual as derivative, is backwards.
Most of the errors in the history of Christianity can be traced to this single inversion. Making the water the cause of regeneration. Making the law the cause of righteousness. Making correct doctrine the cause of salvation. Making the institution the cause of the church. Making the ceremony the cause of the covenant. Every one of these errors puts the visible before the invisible. And every one of them collapses under the weight of the sentence we started with.
Everything that exists is a thought in the mind of God.
The invisible is more real than the visible. Always. In every domain.
If you accept that, turn the page. Everything else follows.
“This is just philosophy, not theology.”
The Bible teaches it explicitly. “In the beginning was the Word” (John 1:1). “Things which are seen were not made of things which do appear” (Hebrews 11:3). “By him all things consist” (Colossians 1:17). The philosophy follows the Scripture. Not the other way around.
“If reality is just God’s thought, is the physical world not real?”
It IS real. But it’s real the way a rendering is real. It has genuine substance, but the substance is derived from something more fundamental. Christ’s resurrection body ate fish. Matter is real. It’s just not fundamental.
“This sounds like pantheism. God IS everything.”
No. God thinks everything. The Author isn’t the book. The Painter isn’t the painting. Creation exists in God’s mind but is not identical with God. Pantheism collapses the distinction between Creator and creation. Idealism maintains it. The thought is not the Thinker. But the thought cannot exist without the Thinker.
“If God authors everything, He’s responsible for evil.”
Yes. He is. Isaiah 45:7. The question is whether “responsibility” means “guilt.” It does not. It is impossible for God to sin, because sin is defined as rebellion against God. God cannot rebel against Himself. Creating evil for His purposes is not the same thing as sinning. The potter shapes the clay into whatever vessel He pleases. The clay doesn’t get to accuse the potter (Romans 9:20).
“You’re not a theologian. You don’t have credentials.”
Neither did Peter. Neither did John. Neither did the tentmaker from Tarsus. The truth doesn’t care about credentials. It cares about Scripture. And Scripture is open to anyone who can read.
Read A Thought in the Mind of God offline in your preferred format.
Commentary