Bootstrap
Back to Book
Appendices

Infralapsarianism vs. Supralapsarianism - Selection vs. Election

Appendix B: Infralapsarianism vs. Supralapsarianism - Selection vs. Election

This comparison is derived from Bob Higby’s definitive study on pristinegrace.org. The table maps every major distinction between the two positions.


Category Infralapsarianism (Selection) Supralapsarianism (Election)
Direction of Planning Left to right (beginning to end). God creates, then reacts to the fall. Right to left (end to beginning). God starts with the destination and plans backward.
The Fall Permitted. God allowed Adam to fall. Authored. God ordained the fall for the purpose of redemption.
Election God selects from a fallen mass. Chooses some, passes over others. God elects from eternity. The end was the starting point of the plan.
The Decree Order 1. Create. 2. Permit fall. 3. Elect some to salvation. 4. Provide redemption. 1. Glorify Christ and His people. 2. Provide redemption. 3. Ordain the fall. 4. Create.
Evil Permitted by God. God allows but does not author evil. Authored by God. “I make peace, and create evil” (Isaiah 45:7).
God’s Sovereignty Sovereign over salvation, but evil operates with a degree of independence (“permission”). Sovereign over ALL things. Nothing operates independently. Permission is sovereignty with plausible deniability.
Adam Created righteous. Fell by free will. Created sinful. The fall revealed a nature already inclined toward sin.
Satan Created righteous. Fell by pride. Created evil. Never righteous. Isaiah 14 is about Babylon.
The Cross God’s response to the fall. Remedy for a problem. God’s purpose from eternity. The Lamb slain from the foundation of the world (Revelation 13:8).
The Reprobate Passed over. Could have been saved but weren’t chosen. Authored for a different purpose. Never candidates for salvation. Vessels of wrath fitted to destruction (Romans 9:22).
Equal Ultimacy Denied. Election is active, reprobation is passive (preterition). Affirmed. Both election and reprobation are positive decrees of equal ultimacy.
Gordon Clark’s Principle Not applied. “The logical order of any plan is the exact reverse of its temporal execution.” The first step in planning is the end to be achieved.

The Key Insight

Infralapsarianism is really selection, not election. It says God looked at a fallen mass and selected some for salvation. But selection implies a pool of candidates who already exist. Election implies a decree that precedes the candidates. God didn’t choose from a group. He authored the group according to the choice. The end came first. The means followed.

See Bob Higby, “Infralapsarianism vs. Supralapsarianism: Selection vs. Election” (pristinegrace.org), and Gordon Clark, “Supralapsarianism” (pristinegrace.org).

Download the Full Book

Read A Thought in the Mind of God offline in your preferred format.

Joshua

Joshua

Shall we play a game? Ask me about articles, sermons, or theology from our library. I can also help you navigate the site.