Why going farther and beyond Calvin or traditional "Calvinism" must necessarily be wrong, evil, dangerous? From whence cometh this idea that all development in doctrine should cease after 1648 / or 1689?
I am a living, breathing "hyper" ("above", "beyond") Calvinist on some points and I'm quite OK with that.
Theology:
Comments
Your comment has been submitted and is awaiting moderation. Once approved, it will appear on this page.
Be the first to comment!