The sermon entitled "Three Objections to the Sovereignty of God" by Fred Evans addresses the doctrinal complexities surrounding God's sovereignty, specifically in the context of election and reprobation as discussed in Romans 9:19-24. The preacher deals with three key objections: the faithfulness of God's Word despite Israel’s unbelief, the perceived injustice of God's sovereignty in electing some while condemning others, and the assertion that God cannot hold individuals accountable for actions He ordains. Evans supports each point with Scripture, noting examples from Romans 9 and other texts like Acts 2 and Psalm 115 to highlight God's ultimate authority and mercy. He emphasizes that God's character is just and that both divine mercy toward the elect and His justice in reprobation serve His glory. This complex relationship is crucial for understanding Reformed doctrines, particularly the sovereignty of God in salvation and human responsibility.
Key Quotes
“Who in the world do you think you are? Let us then bow before our Maker and not strive with Him.”
“It is not of him that willeth or him that runneth, but God that showeth mercy.”
“God does whatsoever He pleases with sinful men. He will raise them up, and they will always rise against His right and condemn His justice.”
“Had God not chosen some, all of us would have been fitted for destruction.”
The Bible affirms God's sovereignty in all aspects of creation and governance, demonstrating that He is in control of everything.
The Scripture, particularly in Romans 9, emphasizes the sovereignty of God in the election and reprobation of individuals. Paul addresses objections to God's sovereignty by demonstrating that it is not unjust for God to choose some for mercy and leave others to their own sinful nature. His mercy and justice coexist perfectly within His sovereign will. For example, God raises up vessels of honor and vessels of wrath from the same lump of humanity, showing that His choice is based on His purpose and will, not on human merit or actions. Hence, God's sovereignty is foundational to understanding His character and actions toward humanity.
Romans 9:19-24
Election is rooted in the character of God, who chooses individuals based on His mercy and purpose rather than their works.
Election is affirmed in Scripture through various examples, such as Isaac and Jacob, who were chosen by God despite their merits or actions. In Romans 9, Paul asserts that God's choice of Jacob over Esau demonstrates that election is not based on works but on divine purpose to show mercy on whom He wills. This truth underscores that God is not only sovereign but also just, as it is in His nature to choose and to glorify Himself through His mercy towards the elect and His justice towards the reprobate. Therefore, the doctrine of election stands firmly on the premise that God's grace is unmerited and wholly dependent on His sovereign will.
Romans 9:10-13, Ephesians 1:4-5
God's justice is crucial for Christians because it reveals His righteousness and the seriousness of sin, ensuring that He is rightly revered.
The justice of God is integral to His character and provides a framework for understanding sin and grace. In Romans 9, Paul addresses the objections regarding God's justice in the context of His sovereign choices. He clarifies that God exercises His justice without injustice, stating that He is just in leaving some in their sinful condition and in choosing others for salvation. This justice showcases God's holiness and His right to deal with humanity according to His will. For Christians, acknowledging God's justice leads to a deeper appreciation of His grace and mercy, as it reinforces the unmerited nature of salvation and the gravity of sin. This understanding calls for humility and reverence, recognizing that we, by nature, are deserving of His wrath and fully reliant on His grace for our standing before Him.
Romans 9:14-16, Hebrews 10:31
God's hatred for Esau signifies His sovereign choice in election and illustrates the seriousness of divine judgment.
The statement 'Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated' is a profound declaration of God's sovereign choice in the context of salvation. This expression does not imply a capricious or arbitrary dislike but rather illustrates God's divine justice and judgment. In Romans 9, Paul uses this comparison to highlight the distinction between those whom God elects for mercy and those He passes over, leaving them to their just desserts. God's hatred towards Esau is integral to understanding His righteousness; it emphasizes that all humanity is deserving of His wrath due to sin. The emphasis on Esau serves to clarify that God's choices are rooted in His purpose and sovereignty, reinforcing the idea that salvation is a work of grace rather than human merit.
Romans 9:13, Malachi 1:2-3
God's sovereignty and human responsibility coexist; humans are accountable for their actions, while God's sovereign will ultimately governs all outcomes.
The coexistence of divine sovereignty and human responsibility is a core tenet of Reformed theology, particularly as expressed in Romans 9. While God exercises sovereignty over all creation, individuals are still held accountable for their sinful actions. Paul addresses this tension by stating that God's decrees do not eliminate human accountability but rather affirm that each person acts according to their nature. For instance, the betrayal of Judas was ordained by God, yet Judas bore full culpability for his actions. The mystery lies in understanding that God ordains all things, including evil acts, without being responsible for the sin itself. This mystery invites believers to rest in God's ultimate authority and justice while recognizing their moral agency in choices.
Romans 9:18-22, Acts 2:23
Comments
Your comment has been submitted and is awaiting moderation. Once approved, it will appear on this page.
Be the first to comment!