Bootstrap
Mike McInnis

Jacob Have I Loved #49

Romans 9:13
Mike McInnis • February, 8 2016 • Audio
0 Comments
What does the Bible say about God's love for Jacob and hatred for Esau?

Romans 9:13 states, 'Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated,' highlighting God's sovereign choice in bestowing love.

Romans 9:13 references God's sovereign prerogative in choosing whom to love and whom to reject, as illustrated in the contrast between Jacob and Esau. This doctrine emphasizes that God's love is not based on human merit or action, but rather flows from His own purpose and desire. This teaching, while often met with resistance, is crucial to understanding the nature of God’s redemptive plan, which indicates that His love is bestowed according to His everlasting covenant rather than by any action from man. Understanding this helps to clarify the true purpose of Christ’s Atonement, as it relates to those whom God has chosen rather than a general universal application of His love.

Romans 9:13, 1 Corinthians 1:27-29

How do we know God's love is sovereignly dispensed?

The sovereignty of God's love is demonstrated in scripture, showing it is given according to His will, not human merit.

The concept of God's sovereign love is articulated in Romans 9:13, where God declares His love for Jacob and His hatred for Esau. This scripture illuminates that God's action is not arbitrary but deeply rooted in His eternal purpose. God's love operates outside the confines of human free will, underscoring that His decisions are based solely on His divine purpose. If we fail to recognize this truth, we risk skewing our understanding of God’s character and the relationship He has with humanity. Furthermore, scriptures that speak of God's election, such as Ephesians 1:4-5, substantiate the idea that His love is specially directed towards those He has chosen before the foundation of the world.

Romans 9:13, Ephesians 1:4-5

Why is it important for Christians to understand the distinction between Jacob and Esau?

Understanding the distinction between Jacob and Esau highlights God's sovereign grace in His elect and non-elect.

Recognizing the biblical contrast between Jacob and Esau is vital for Christians as it illuminates the doctrine of election and God's sovereign grace. This separation illustrates that not all are recipients of His grace, and that inclusion into God's promises is contingent upon His divine choice. The narrative serves as a metaphor for the spiritual condition of humanity, where Jacob represents the elect, those born anew by the Spirit, and Esau embodies the non-elect, representing carnal humanity. This truth is essential not only for accurate doctrine but for motivating believers to engage in spiritual humility, acknowledging that their standing before God is not based on their actions but solely His sovereign grace. This understanding also underscores the importance of the Gospel and Christ’s Atonement, affirming that it is specifically effective for the elect.

Romans 9:13, Ephesians 1:5

Sermon Transcript

Auto-generated transcript • May contain errors

100%
Thy mercy, my God, is the theme
of my song. Welcome, friends, to another
broadcast that is more serious for Zion's 4th. One of the most
neglected of scriptures, along with its subsequent teaching,
is found in Romans 9, 13. As it is written, Jacob have
I loved, but Esau have I hated. Here Paul is referring to the
prophecy of Malachi as Malachi is quoting the very words of
God himself. The Lord does here plainly state
that it is his own prerogative to love whom he will and conversely
to hate whom he will. None can deny that he has the
right to bestow his love on whom he will according to his own
desire and purpose. There are usually many collective
gasps that arise from the congregation of the religious when such doctrine
is set forth. Yet this vital teaching cannot
be neglected, lest one should be guilty of misrepresenting
the plain truth of God. It is impossible to exactly define
the moment when the Lord bestowed His love upon the people of His
choice, but it is clear that He describes His love for those
who are hidden in Christ as being the recipients of an everlasting
love. Yea, I have loved thee with an
everlasting love, therefore with lovingkindness have I drawn thee.
While we cannot define the exact beginning of this love for this
people which he has hidden in his Son, the Scripture plainly
tells us that it was from before the foundation of the world.
If we fail to recognize this foundational truth, then everything
else we might try to understand about the Lord's relationships
with mankind in general will be skewed, and we can have no
true understanding of what it is that Jesus Christ came into
the world to accomplish. Most of the error which surrounds
man's misunderstanding and subsequent false teaching concerning the
Atonement of Christ arises out of a failure to grasp the differentiation
which the Lord makes between those who are the recipients
of His love and those who are not. Those who worship at the
shrine of man's free will despise the notion that God's redemptive
love is sovereignly dispensed and reject the notion that man
cannot gain God's favor by an action of that free will. Much
gnashing of teeth is exhibited as they express their disdain
for the plain truth of God and picture the Lord as one who can
only cooperate with that which men would bring forth according
to their decisions and persuasions. Effectively, this puts man in
a position of more power than God Himself, which is, of course,
ridiculous and blasphemous at the same time. When the children
of Israel who had wandered in the wilderness for forty years
were about to enter into the promised land, the Lord made
it very clear that not all of the land which they might traverse
was designed for them to dwell in. Just as the Lord had designed
a land for them to purposely inhabit and delight in, He had
also, in His sovereign purpose, given lands into the possession
of others who were not the inheritors of His blessings. This is illustrated
for us specifically with that people whose lineage could be
traced back to Esau, who was Jacob's twin brother. Esau is
representative, in the matter of redemption, of those who are
not the elect of God. He is also representative of
that man of the flesh, in contrast to Jacob, who is representative
of that man who was born again by the Spirit of Christ. There
is a natural enmity of that which is of the flesh with that which
is of the Spirit. Just as Esau fulfilled the purpose
of God in the place of his habitation, so too does this sinful flesh
fulfill the purpose of God. The land of promise is not ruled
by a carnal commandment. do this and live, but rather
by the principle of expediency. Religious men love carnal commandments,
and libertines love the lusts of the flesh, both of which principles
abound in the land of Esau. Yet the land of promise is ruled
by the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus, which manifests
that its inhabitants are delivered from the law of sin and death.
A man cannot and will not delight in that which he does not love
any more than he will reject that which he delights in. Apart
from a man being born from above by the Spirit of life, he will
gladly inhabit the land of Esau and hate the way of Jacob. My
sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me. And
I give unto them eternal life, and they shall never perish,
neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. If you would like a free transcript
of this broadcast, email us at 4the4 at windstream dot net.
Mike McInnis
About Mike McInnis
Mike McInnis is an elder at Grace Chapel in O'Brien Florida. He is also editor of the Grace Gazette.
Broadcaster:

Comments

0 / 2000 characters
Comments are moderated before appearing.

Be the first to comment!

Joshua

Joshua

Shall we play a game? Ask me about articles, sermons, or theology from our library. I can also help you navigate the site.